Conversio Virium
New York City’s Student BDSM Education Group
Court Decides S&M Not Consensual
Published on March 7, 2007 at 6:38 PM by tyler | Filed under BDSM in the Media | 2 CommentsReason Magazine has a new article today headlined Court Decides S&M Not Consensual:
An interesting case exploring the limits of how much a typical jury can be expected to understand some of the curious emotional realities of the sexual worlds of bondage and sadomasochism has come to an end…
You can discuss the linked article here or at the site posted.
(Do you know of a news item that you don’t see mentioned in our archives and want to share? Please send it in! Or even better, send us your own opinions.)
2 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
The opinions and views expressed on this web site are the beliefs of the Conversio Virium club member who wrote them and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of other members or affiliated organizations.
Unless otherwise noted, all original content on this site is protected under an Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivs 3.0 Unported license and is hereby copyright © 2007–2010 by Conversio Virium and its contributors.
Powered by WordPress with Pool theme design by Borja Fernandez and modified by Meitar Moscovitz of Maymay Media.
Entries and comments feeds.
Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^
This comment could be attached to almost any post on the site, but I think it fits here just as well as anywhere else. I have a sort of question as to why S/M stands for “sadomasochism”, and not “sadism and masochism.” Until joining CV, I had thought it stood for the latter. My hypothesis as to why “sadism and masochism” is inappropriate and inaccurate is that true “sadism” (as derived from the writings of de Sade) does not require the safety, sanity, and consent of the parties involved. Rather, “sadomasochism” implies that the type of “sadism” that occurs during S/M play is contingent on the fantasies and limits of the masochist, and is in fact desirable and entirely consensual, even through what some might consider extreme situations. I was wondering if anyone else had an opinion (or the actual reason) why S/M stands for “sadomasochism”, and what you all think.
Comment by Courtney — March 10, 2007 #
Tristan Taormino of the Voice comments on this case in her Pucker Up column. She will actually be on campus for Sexhibition, date to follow. If anyone remembers the article on the back of my puppy handout, she is the author of it. She is a wonderful writer and figure in the kink world. I’m certainly going to be there.
http://www.villagevoice.com/people/0712,taormino,76097,24.html
Comment by tyler — March 20, 2007 #